22 Comments
User's avatar
Larry Kiehl's avatar

If there's nothing to see here, then why did the govt refuse to release documents that were held beyond the 50yr period?! There's something they don't want revealed, still.

Expand full comment
JamesHoward's avatar

Tha Agency releasing documents the way Hamass releases hostages.

Expand full comment
Darrin's avatar

There are likely no files or documents in existence that can definitively contradict the official narrative. The truth will remain hidden.

Expand full comment
Surak's avatar

But you know the truth somehow?

Expand full comment
JamesHoward's avatar

Jokes & fairly tales.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Love ya Sharyl and not ripping you at all: we will never see the real files; this is just performative.

Jackie picking up brain material on the trunk tells the story we need to see and we never will.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

I would like to see contextual quotes of the redacted material i.e., comparison of redacted vs unredacted versions of the same documents. That should help explain what it was the government didn't want us to see and why. And if that proves to be insignificant, then we will know they are probably still withholding the most incriminating documents or have destroyed them.

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

One foreign group won't be mentioned.

Expand full comment
Paul McCutchen's avatar

They are really taking their time with the Epstein files. Some author must have first Dibbs on the movie rights

Expand full comment
Timothy Fountain's avatar

Thanks for a good distillation of the "so far" for us, Sharyl.

Expand full comment
Chris Akin's avatar

Whoever the redactors are, I hope they work in a well ventilated area. The primary toxic chemical found in many black marker inks, especially permanent markers, is xylene.

Expand full comment
Maurine Meleck's avatar

Thank you for adding more information to the fire. I was in school at that time and so fascinated (and distraut) by what happened that I read every book at that time on the assasination that I could get a hold of. The first one by Mark Lane I still have. I discovered through all the reading that many were involved in the assasination including our CIA, the KGB, the Mob, and even one suggestion that VP Johnson was involved. As I recall, Kennedy didn't want war-others did including an invasion of Cuba. Kennedy wanted out of VietNam in the early years, others did not. JFK was an honest President while others wanted to continue a government of secrecy to carry out their desired plans. All of the material released so far is fascinating-some more than others. No surprise that some balk at all the releases-as if they aren't important or credible. Sharyl Attkisson's work on this is commmendable. And not to forget that his Attorney General RFK was after the "Mob."

Expand full comment
Chas's avatar

YAWN 🥱

Expand full comment
Phil C's avatar

I'm glad to see the release of more information. The government withholds way too much information from the public.

Expand full comment
Brad's avatar

Publicity stunt for the failed Orange Baboon!

Expand full comment
Surak's avatar

What a loser you are

Expand full comment
Dan Graham's avatar

There's a good chance Sharyl will be selling a bunch of new "conspiracy" t-shirts featuring updated hints that all still is not what it's cracked up to be (and I personally, will be one of the first to have at least a couple of them).

Expand full comment